Comparison of Galerkin and collocation Trefftz formulations for plane elasticity
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to compare and assess, more in terms of computational efficiency than in terms of accuracy, three alternative implementations of a boundary formulation based on the Trefftz method for linear elastostatics, namely a collocation-based and two Galerkin-based approaches. A finite element approach is used in the derivation of the formulation for the Galerkin-based alternative implementations. The coefficients of the structural matrices and vectors are defined either by regular boundary integral expressions or determined by direct collocation of the trial functions. Numerical tests are performed to assess the relative performance of the different alternative implementations.
Keywords
References
[1] R.A. Adey, N. Kamiya, E. Kita, eds. Trefftz method: 70 years, special issue. Adv. Engng. Software, 24, 1995.[2] J.A.T. Freitas. Formulation of elastostatic hybrid-Trefftz stress elements. Camp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng, 153: 127- 151, 1998.
[3] J.A.T. Freitas, C. Cismaşiu. Numerical implementation of hybrid-Trefftz displacement elements. Comput. Struct., in press, 1999.
[4] J .A.T. Freitas, Z.-y. Ji. Hybrid-Trefftz boundary integral formulation for the simulation of singular stress fields. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 39: 281-308, 1996.
[5] J.A.T. Freitas, Z.-Y. Ji. Hybrid-Trefftz equilibrium model for crack problems. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 39: 569-584, 1996.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
